THE WORD "CANONICAL" – ABUSE AND
MISUSE
ONE REASON FOR SEPARATION
WITHIN ORTHODOXY
By The Most
Reverend Metropolitan Archbishop Stephen
Protohierarch of the Syro-Russian Orthodox Catholic Church
I
would like to preface this article by making several points. (1) We, as
Orthodox Catholic Christians, must realize that the Orthodox Christian
Church is the true establishment of Christ God, being the first to
exist, and not having as its founder any human man. (2) It is not the
Church that goes astray or falls into error, but those who lead it. (3)
There are pious and wicked ways existing in the world in which all
conduct business, and all humanity has the God-given right to use their
free-will in any manner they wish and we pray it is always used for good.
Let
us recall that Christ God forgave Mary Magdalene of her sins and today
she is a saint of the Church. Christ God forgave the good Thief and
told him that he would be with our Lord in heaven. Christ God forgave
Peter for denying Him thrice and he became the First Bishop of Antioch
and a saint of the Church. Christ God demonstrated the greatest gift of
forgiveness when he died for our sins and reopened the Gates of Heaven
to us. Yet it can be verified by documentation that some who have
approached so-called canonical
Bishops for acceptance have been ignored and scoffed at by these same
hierarchs who claim that they work and pray for the unity of all
Orthodox. It is time that we not be led astray any longer by words of
some bishops that have no substance, and by those who fail to practice
what they preach. Instead we must pray for them that their ways be
changed to reflect the love of Christ God for all.
We hear more and more these days the words canonical
and uncanonical.
It is used among many of the Orthodox Churches of the world, especially
in the United States of America, to distinguish the SCOBA Orthodox from
other Orthodox believers. Many feel that this is the result of the
formation of what is known today as SCOBA, Standing Conference of
(Canonical) Bishops in the Americas.
Formed in 1960 at the initiative of the Greek Orthodox Church, and
headed by it, it has become known by some as a country club
open only to certain Orthodox Bishops. These hierarchs take pride in
espousing the allegation that they are the only canonical
hierarchs and often make maligning statements against those not part of
their organization. Their approach to non-SCOBA hierarchs and
autocephalous Orthodox jurisdictions has been most horrific at times
even to the point where they have referred to them as invalid and
pretend-Orthodox. One must ask how this is keeping with the Word of God
and all that Christ God taught and died for. This is often motivated by
the thirst for power and money as many of their member hierarchs
continually work hard at becoming the largest Church. One might ask
just who is canonical? Even member priests of such Churches have stated
their objection to such a term and its definition in publications. It
is this type of organization that perpetuates separation among Orthodox
Christians and keeps feuds among the various jurisdictions continuing.
This term can be rightly used if applied to the heterordox, i.e., those
following a different doctrine or opinion, or to those who have broken
with canons and apostolic traditions of the Apostolic Church of our
Lord. However, they try to achieve self-acclaim and power by directing
this word at those with the same faith and traditions but who may not
be part of the organization. In a recent public statement published on
the web, Archbishop Nathaniel of the Romanian Orthodox Church has
criticized their existence and stated that SCOBA has no real
jurisdiction or canonical purpose at all.
The word canonical
is a just a word and if correctly used for the right reasons does carry
weight but unfortunately it is often misused by the very people who try
to make others think that their main objective is to protect the
Church. When this word is used rightly it makes reference to the
correct way or ways that a jurisdiction conducts its affairs, e.g., canonical
age makes
reference to the age that one must be before he can be ordained and
serve in a specific manner within the Church. Most rightfully used when
it makes reference to canonical books or canons of
Scripture as the approved books of the Holy Bible. A canonical
act
is when a Bishop disciplines a member for disobedience to the laws of
the Church, or when he might make a parish or parochial assignment, or
when a priest administers a Mystery of the Church. However, when this
word is used by some to call attention to those who are not members of
a particular organization it is abused and misused because then it
becomes a personal issue such as when we say beauty is in the
eyes of the beholder.
What might appear to be canonical to one may not be the same to
another. So, all jurisdictions that follow apostolic teachings,
customs, canons, and preach the one faith of Christ God, having proper
orders, are canonical.
Recently a priest of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Minnesota told
another priest that Old Calendarist Greek Orthodox were not canonical!
This same priest serving a parish that once was considered uncanonical
by SCOBA before its segment went back to union with a Bishop whom is
part of SCOBA. Yet prior to this the faith was the same as it is now,
the liturgy did not change, the clergy were as valid before as after,
yet because of its joining this organization it miraculously became
canonical. Now they use the very word they disliked against those who
chose on their own volition to be autocephalous and free from such
organizations. It was appalling to hear this and in most cases their
definition of the word is simply - they are not recognized by a
patriarch or by SCOBA. Forgive me, but all this time I thought we must
all be recognized by God Almighty. There is only one true Vicar of
Christ's holy Church, and that is the Holy Spirit.
Autocephalous
Orthodox Churches and Old Calendar Orthodox Churches are canonical and
are obeying the laws of God as well as those that are considered to be
the Canons of the Holy Orthodox Catholic Church. Their only difference
is wishing to remain free of ecclesial politics and issues that they
feel are not canonical and not in keeping with the original intentions
of the early Church Fathers. They are not members of SCOBA but then
what law exists from the early Ecumenical Councils that states they
must be? This organization was nonexistent prior to 1960. To them, and
rightly so, many of the so-called canonical jurisdictions
are simply non-canonical. The only true judgment in this matter belongs
to Almighty God. In a country such as ours where the Orthodox Church
wants to present itself to those outside of the faith it would be much
better if all true-professing Orthodox
Christians were united in faith instead of fighting because of a word.
I have experienced the prejudice of those who would rather see
destruction than harmony and peace as have many other good Orthodox
Bishops and faithful. If SCOBA were truly a well-intentioned body of
hierarchs concerned about the Orthodox Church it would embrace all
jurisdictions and forgive any who may have gone astray and, for those
who may have erred in teaching and/or practice, forgive them and teach
them what is right and just. Perhaps then we can rid confusion among
the non-Orthodox and Orthodox laity when they hear us say, I am
Greek Orthodox; I am Ukrainian Orthodox; I am Syro-Russian Orthodox
and simply say that we are Orthodox Christian.
Then we would have only different jurisdictions that are part of one
Church as professed in the Holy Creed instead of many Churches all with
the same Faith. Are we meant to be many Churches? Is that what Christ
God wanted? No, He came and established One Holy Catholic and Apostolic
Church (of Orthodox Faith). It is a sin for any hierarch to push aside
those who come knocking at their doors for acceptance and forgiveness
and for love. If they do they are not representing Christ God on this
earth and in His Church. There can be no dispute about this among any
reasonable and God-fearing persons. It is good to be proud of your
ethnic heritage but it should never ascend above the pride we should
have for being Orthodox Christians. We should always strive to remove
the very things that separate us and replace them with those things
that will unite us.
With
all this said, let us not ignore the fact that there are those who have
changed or completely separated from the faith but still call
themselves Orthodox. There are those who use this name but never were a
part of Orthodox Christianity. There are also those who offer different
doctrinal interpretation or unorthodox dogma that have separated them
from Eastern Orthodox Catholicism, and those who disagree on semantics
concerning issues of faith, e.g., the Oriental Orthodox. However, the
Orientals are Orthodox and they possess valid orders and are the
exception to what is being said in this paragraph. There are many Old
Catholic
groups especially in the United States who are not recognized by the
Union of Utrecht, and who use "Orthodox"
in their name. The Union of Utrecht refers to the Old Catholic Church
of the Utrecht in the Diocese of the Netherlands that separated from
Rome in A.D. 1870 with valid orders. However, those outside this body
have failed to gain recognition from Rome, and those using the Orthodox
name can rightly be referred to as non-canonical because they are void
of the complete Orthodox faith and in some cases any validity of
orders. They often preach the teachings of Rome and use the Filioque
Clause when reciting the Creed, they follow many Roman customs yet
they like to insert Orthodox into their name, e.g., Apostolic
Orthodox Church or Orthodox Old Catholic Church.
A rhinestone can look like a diamond – but is it? Those who have the
capability of reasonable thinking will know the difference.
It
is time for SCOBA to embrace all Orthodox Christians who are of right
faith and direct certain words at those truly deserving of them and not
those who simply wish to be autocephalous and apart from patriarchal
control - but who are in fact Orthodox Christian. Then respect will be
given them for what they stand for but not on demand as they expect
now, but because when respect is given it should also be
received. Let
God remain the giver of justice and let us maintain the peace of Christ
God. Let us remember that we are all sinners in the eyes of God, but we
can make changes and work with dedication and sincerity for the good of
the Church and for Christ God our Lord. As our Lord said, "Let he
who is without sin cast the first stone ." As I recall, only our
Lord was born without sin and remained so. Glory to You, O Lord, Glory
to You. Amen!
|